A Critical Analytical Perspective on the Conduct of the Public Auction
The question arises: How do properties become liquid in the corridors of courts? The public auction is the final stop in the journey of any lawsuit, which begins with a debtor who evades payment. It is the moment when assets—whether real estate, vehicles, or movable goods—are converted into cash so that the creditor can recover their rights. As a law student, I see the auction as a laboratory of truth, where the true value of assets emerges, far removed from paper valuations.
What is the true purpose of a public auction?
The court acts as the seller of the debtor’s assets. The process begins with a request from the creditor, followed by an evaluation of the assets by experts, and then the scheduling of the auction. Its main goal is transparency: anyone with financial capacity can participate and bid to ensure the highest possible price, covering as much of the debt as possible.
Regarding the pros and cons of this procedure:
The advantages include price fairness. The auction prevents favoritism because the market determines the price, not the whims of the debtor or creditor. It also offers speed of liquidation, serving as an effective means to convert idle assets into cash, especially when the property or asset is difficult to divide.
The disadvantages, however, can lead to the lowest possible prices. Sometimes, assets are sold in auctions for significantly less than their market value, severely harming the debtor. Additionally, the procedure can be slow within a single auction cycle, taking months between evaluation, announcement, and scheduling. People grow weary, leading to buyer reluctance and complicating property registration. Many people are afraid to participate in court auctions.
From my personal perspective, public auctions in our courts need a digital revolution, as they are still managed by an old, traditional system, which is the core criticism. The biggest problem is the procedural intimidation faced by ordinary people. They fear buying property through the court, assuming that subsequent legal procedures, such as transferring ownership or evicting occupants, will be problematic. This fear reduces the number of bidders, lowers competition, and results in assets being sold at bargain prices.
News
Subscribe to Al-Siyasa Newspaper
Vehicle Laws and Driving Regulations
There is also the issue of valuation. Experts sometimes value properties at unrealistic prices that the market does not accept, causing the auction to fail in the first and second sessions, and trapping the creditor in an endless cycle of waiting.
In conclusion, the public auction is a brilliant idea for achieving justice, but its implementation requires facilitation. We need fully electronic public auctions with professional marketing standards, legal guarantees for buyers so they can purchase with confidence, and assurance that procedures will conclude smoothly. The auction should be an investment opportunity benefiting the public, not just a painful mandatory stop for the debtor.
Issa Adel Al-Issa
College of Business Studies – Law Major
