The position of preacher is a government job; an idea worth studying
Marriage has become a pressing concern for many. As the number of single men and women rises, we observe that practical solutions are scarce or rarely proposed. The issue is no longer merely a personal matter; it now affects family stability and the future of society as a whole. Hearing about the idea of a “government matchmaker” may seem surprising, but such a role was originally part of our society for a long time, when social ties were stronger and matchmakers helped unite hearts and facilitate marriage. However, as life has changed, circumstances have shifted.
In reality, the number of young men and women is increasing, and many wish to marry, yet they face numerous challenges. These include weak social networks, the high costs of marriage, and the difficulty of finding a suitable partner. Often, financial or psychological conditions further complicate this step. Therefore, the idea of establishing a specialized government entity or creating the position of “government matchmaker” under the supervision of the Ministry of Social Affairs and the Ministry of Justice deserves serious consideration. This service would be voluntary, with full respect for privacy and confidentiality, and within a legal and religious framework.
Its role could focus on facilitating introductions between those seeking marriage, verifying their information, conducting initial compatibility assessments, and communicating with families if there is mutual interest. Additionally, it could track cases of unmarried men and women, proactively review their situations, and assist them in marrying. After all, no one truly wishes to remain unmarried or avoid forming a family; however, for some, taking the first step is extremely difficult, especially if they lack family support—such as parents, siblings, or aunts—or if they have had negative prior experiences. The latest statistics on this issue are alarming.
True success requires societal support, such as encouraging the reduction of dowries and limiting exorbitant marriage costs. Building a family is a shared responsibility among the state, society, and the family; it is unfair to place the entire burden on a single entity. The idea is not for the state to replace the family or interfere in people’s private lives, but rather to provide a secure institutional solution for those who struggle to find a life partner through traditional means. Social problems are not solved by ignoring them, but by seeking realistic solutions. If the state provides support for housing, employment, education, and healthcare, why not consider an initiative that helps build families, given that the family is the foundation of any strong society?
Some may view this idea as inappropriate, while others welcome it. What matters most is that we begin an honest dialogue about practical solutions suited to our contemporary context. Ultimately, true investment lies not in static assets, but in people and in families founded on love and peace of mind.
