Kuwaiti Social Engineering

The article compares the Singaporean experience in social engineering with current reform efforts in Kuwait.
Translated by Qiyas from الجريدة — Original source
In the last century, the Republic of Singapore developed a unique developmental model known as “social engineering,” demonstrating through its rigorous practical application that the social behavior of individuals and communities is not an immutable genetic destiny, but rather an acquired cultural trait that can be entirely changed and directed. This developmental model relied on effective tools, including awareness-raising campaigns, the enactment of strict laws, the imposition of financial fines, and the integration of different ethnic groups in public housing to break down social isolation. Within less than thirty years, Singapore achieved comprehensive change that significantly improved the quality of daily life, positively impacted national productivity rates, and triggered a major leap in educational and economic development, making its experience a subject of study today in leading international universities and institutes.
What we are witnessing now in the State of Kuwait represents a tangible transformation and a genuine turning point in people’s lives after years of administrative and social chaos. In previous years, corruption had been slowly eroding the state and its institutions, corrupting society and giving rise to negative behaviors and practices unrelated to the concept of a modern state. People relied on “wasta” (connections) and nepotism to conduct their government affairs, and leveraged social status to secure volunteer positions and leadership roles in civil society institutions such as associations and unions. At the same time, some officials strived to prioritize private service and narrow interests over the greater public good, leading to the accumulation and entrenchment of neglect. Consequently, change has become difficult today, and opportunists are viewed by some as role models and examples of generosity and success.
The similarities between the early Singaporean model and the new Kuwaiti approach are considerable. While Singapore launched its national project with a focus on cleanliness and the strict imposition of fines on the streets, our reformist steps here began with tightening traffic fines, pursuing municipal encroachment violations, and other laws and regulations designed to enforce the authority of the law on everyone without exception. Assessing behavior and restoring discipline are the cornerstones that create loyal statesmen who carry their responsibilities with efficiency, thereby fostering conscious generations that value hard work and self-discipline, respect the law, and reject its violators.